|
![]() Type 2 diabetes strongly featured During the EASD (European Association for the Study of Diabetes) meeting in Barcelona much of the attention focused around NovoNormŽ and the publication of the UKPDS results The great interest in the outcome of the UKPDS (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study) must be seen as a consequence of the long-standing controversy about the long-term benefit of tight blood sugar regulation in Type 2 diabetes. Some have argued that the benefits were negligible, others that both life expectancy and quality of life would be increased. The UKPDS was seen as the study to end the controversy, as was the US-based DCCT (Diabetes Control and Complications Trial), which was completed in 1993, with respect to Type 1 diabetes.The UKPDS is the longest study ever conducted in the area of Type 2 diabetes and it involved 5.102 patients, making it also the largest. It was driven by professors Robert Turner, Rury Holman and David Mathews from Oxford University. The study began in 1977 and its aim was to establish whether blood glucose control in patients with Type 2 diabetes reduced the risk of macrovascular or microvascular complications. Macrovascular complications include blood clots and stroke. Microvascular complications include blindness, kidney failure and amputations due to nerve damage. The main conclusions of the UKPDS are that intensive blood glucose control by either sulphonylureas or insulin "substantially decreases the risk of microvascular complications such as blindness, kidney failure and amputations, and causes a borderline decrease in myocardial infarction (heart attacks) in patients with Type 2 diabetes". Thus, insulin therapy is beneficial and should be initiated at an early stage. This means that combination therapy using different agents as well as more frequent use of insulin should be advocated, according to the study.
The results of the UKPDS support Novo Nordisks current recommendations and strategies regarding treatment of Type 2 diabetes. Its conclusions are particularly favourable because Novo Nordisk has both insulins and an OAD (Oral Antidiabetic Drug) on the market. Furthermore, the results provide extra support for previous studies conclusions, as well as support the argument for early treatment to reduce diabetic late complications and consequently the strain on countries health budgets, while at the same time improving the quality of life. NovoNormŽ introduced Great success One of the most important objectives was to establish the concept of PGR since it is central to understanding the potential value of NovoNormŽ. To avoid hyperglycaemia as well as hypoglycaemia with one simple treatment was the challenge, when developing NovoNormŽ. And the concept of "One meal, one dose / No meal, no dose" is the simple and straightforward answer to a complicated question: How to allow individuals to eat on a flexible schedule, according to their lifestyles, while at the same time keeping a tight control of the blood glucose levels.
Next step During the initial phases of the launch intentions are to concentrate on providing further information about NovoNormŽ to endocrinologists and diabetologists. These experts are opinion leaders as regards the choice of drugs for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes. In this context, it is an advantage that Novo Nordisk has close relations with these experts from the companys long-standing relationship in the field of insulin. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||