|
At the enzyme factory in Copenhagen, environmental awareness has been put into practice. As we are situated in a densely built-up area it is of vital importance that we make ongoing environmental improvements to ensure that both the authorities and residents in the area feel secure about the factory. Therefore in 1998 we were the first Novo Nordisk factory to design an environmental management system based on the ISO 14001 standard. We gained final environmental certification in September with a closing report from the Danish Standards Association without deviations. The extensive work of building up the system during the first six months of the year included a number of concrete environmental improvements which extend beyond the requirements in the environmental approval for the factory. |
||
|
||||
|
The introduction of environmental management entails that once a year the environmental management system is reviewed by the management as an overall evaluation. In the first status report from December 1998 we could conclude that the system had been introduced successfully and was suited to its purpose. At the same time new targets and action plans for our environmental performance were drawn up. This is an ongoing, systematic process to ensure that we study every environmental aspect and can follow up on individual targets effectively. Close interaction with employees Investment in energy savings Further reduction of odours Environmental projects
Accidental releases The other incident occurred when approximately 300 litres of oil leaked from an elevator's hydraulic system to the ground beneath the building. The extent of the pollution was limited as determined by the examination of soil samples. Breaches of regulatory limit values and complaints from neighbours In 1998 we registered 15 breaches of regulatory limit values. In six cases the limit for enzyme dust in the air, primarily originating from the fermentation tanks, was exceeded. When the air purification plant is established in September 1999, it will significantly reduce the discharge of enzyme dust from fermentation tanks. The regulatory limit value for chloride was exceeded once and for sludge inhibition four times (inhibition of sludge activity), while the limit value for sulphate in waste water was exceeded four times. In future we will use carbonic acid to neutralize the waste water instead of sulphuric acid, thereby avoiding breaches of the regulatory limit value for sulphate. We have received a total of 13 complaints from neighbours in 1998. Eight of these concerned odours, mainly from the fermentation plant. Four concerned noise from equipment and transport activities. |
||
|
||||
|
Health and safety
Consumption of resources Water consumption: 529,000 m3 Energy consumption: 400,000 GJ Raw materials consumption: 24,800 tons Discharges to the environment Liquid waste
Biomass: 246,000 m3 Waste water: 282,000 m3 Solid waste: 1,570 tons Emissions to air Emissions of enzyme dust |
||
|
|
||
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||